On the issue of improving the efficiency of image analysis operators of inspection X-ray machines
Abstract
The article discusses the features of improving the efficiency of the operators of image analysis of inspection X-ray machines by using pre-stored images of prohibited or restricted objects recorded on the basis of those actually identified during control, to impose them randomly on the objects of control. This measure will artificially increase the frequency of the appearance of dangerous objects in front of image analysis operators and, in addition, will allow them to control their work.References
Biggs A.T., Mitroff S.R. Improving the efficacy of security screening tasks: A review of visual search challenges and ways to mitigate their adverse effects // Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 2015. Vol. 29, pp. 142–148.
Donnelly N., Muhl-Richardson, A., Godwin H.J., Cave K.R. Using eye movements to understand how security screeners search for threats in x-ray baggage // Vision. 2019. Vol. 3, pp. 24.
Schwaninger A. Threat Image Projection: Enhancing performance? // Aviat. Secur. Int. 2006. Vol. 13, pp. 36–41.
Buser D., Sterchi Y., Schwaninger A. Why stop after 20 minutes? Breaks and target prevalence in a 60-minute X-ray baggage screening task // Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2020. Vol. 76, pp. 102-197.
Afonin D.N., Afonin P.N. Biomechanics of Professional Pathology of the Spine in Operators of X-ray Cargo-Vision Systems // Proceedings of 2022 25th International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurements, SCM 2022: 25, St. Petersburg, 25–27 мая 2022 года. St. Petersburg, 2022. P. 266-268. EDN YJMNQX.
Godwin H.J., Menneer T., Cave K.R., Donnelly N. Dual-target search for high and low prevalence X-ray threat targets // Vis. Cogn. 2010. Vol. 18, pp. 1439–1463.
Wolfe J.M., Horowitz T.S., Van Wert M.J. et all. Low Target Prevalence Is a Stubborn Source of Errors in Visual Search Tasks // J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2007. Vol. 136, pp. 623–638.
Hofer F., Schwaninger A. Using threat image projection data for assessing individual screener performance // WIT Trans. Built Environ. 2005. Vol. 82, pp. 417–426.
Skorupski J., Uchroński P. A Human Being as a Part of the Security Control System at the Airport // Procedia Eng. 2016. Vol. 134, pp. 291–300.
Meuter R.F.I., Lacherez P.F. When and Why Threats Go Undetected: Impacts of Event Rate and Shift Length on Threat Detection Accuracy during Airport Baggage Screening // Hum. Factors. 2016. Vol. 58, pp. 218–228.
Wolfe J.M., Horowitz T.S., Kenner N.M. Rare targets are often missed in visual search // Nature. 2005. Vol. 435, pp. 439–440.
Wolfe J.M., Brunelli D.N., Rubinstein J., Horowitz T.S. Prevalence effects in newly trained airport checkpoint screeners: Trained observers miss rare targets, too // J. Vis. 2013. Vol. 13, No. 33 (3), pp. 1-9.
Афонин Д. Н., Афонин П.Н. Исследование психофизиологических факторов, определяющих эффективность деятельности операторов анализа изображений // Bulletin of the International Scientific Surgical Association. 2017. Т. 6, № 1. С. 26-28. EDN XYBLZP.
Schwaninger A. Threat image projection: Enhancing performance? // Aviat. Secur. Int. 2006, pp. 36–41.
Humphrey S.E., Nahrgang J.D., Morgeson F.P. Integrating Motivational, Social, and Contextual Work Design Features: A Meta-Analytic Summary and Theoretical Extension of the Work Design Literature // J. Appl. Psychol. 2007. Vol. 92, pp. 1332–1356.
Hackman R., Oldham G.R. Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory // Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 1976. Vol. 16, pp. 250–279.
Roach G.D., Lamond N.; Dawson D. Feedback has a positive effect on cognitive function during total sleep deprivation if there is sufficient time for it to be effectively processed // Appl. Ergon. 2016. Vol. 52, pp. 285–290.
Copyright (c) 2023 Д. Н. Афонин
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
